THURSDAY MAY 17
House Financial Services Committee Scrutinizes Private Equity Taxation

The tax talk continues among the politicians.

May 2007

The democrats say private equity greatly enriches a select few while the firms put a great deal of people out of work. The republicans say the problem isn't with private equity, but with the economy as a whole (including strict regulations such as the Sarbanes Oxley, which some believe drives dollars to the private side). For right now, there is no specific legislation on the table that would put into effect any taxes on private equity. Instead, it's a war of words.

In his industry's own defense, Douglas Lowenstein, president of the Private Equity Council, said, "Private equity investments directly and indirectly benefit tens of millions of Americans."


The House Financial Services Committee today began considering whether private equity funds should be subject to greater regulation and taxation.

“When a small number of individuals benefit from a particular deal in the tens and sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars, and concurrently workers are laid off, we have a situation which, it seems to me, [is] wrong,” said Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., at a hearing today on “private equity’s effects on workers and firms.”

(Continue reading this story on InvestmentNews)

RELATED ARTICLES
May 2007
Table of Contents
1 COMMENTS

Posted by Frank De Rose - May 18 2007 @ 8:18 AM
Re: House Financial Services Committee Scrutinizes Private Equit If the Senate can find a way to add a flat tax to the PE business, then the returns obviously upon exits will not be there. This will force longer holding periods rather than a quick spin and exit. Therefore, immediately paying yourself a dividend or doing a recap are no longer available. Essentially, the IRR's we have seen will disappear!

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Name Email
Subject
Comment
Scan this issue:

Next article » Ford Family Denying Rumors

Previous article « A Hefty Fee For A Change Of Heart